Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Evaluation Review
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devine, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brody, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Devine, J. A.
Right arrow Articles by Brody, C. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

An Evaluation of an Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program for Homeless Substance Abusers

Joel A. Devine

Tulane University

James D. Wright

Tulane University

Charles J. Brody

Tulane University

This article evaluates a residential alcohol/drug treatment program for the homeless. The process evaluation documents numerous deviations from the program as designed and other implementation problems. Foremost among these: The project was designed as a randomized experiment, but randomization was sabotaged by the treatment staff. Nonrandom research attrition constituted another potential source of bias. The authors employ econometric modeling techniques to correct for these selection biases. Results indicate that, although treatment effects are in the expected direction, they are rarely significant. However, consistent with the drug treatment literature, evidence suggests that retention in treatment is a critical variable predicting program effects. Clients who remain in treatment for more than a few months exhibit more positive outcomes than those staying for shorter periods.

Evaluation Review, Vol. 19, No. 6, 620-645 (1995)
DOI: 10.1177/0193841X9501900602


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?